.jpg&w=48&q=75){kind=small}
Bladmuziek
Partijen
Manuscript, n.d.(ca.1780).
Uitgever
Manuscript, n.d.(ca.1780).
Overige opmerkingen
Mss.Ms. 20482-5 in Stabikat-Berlin. The parts bundle has 4 violin parts (2 for the violin I section and 2 for the violin II section) and a viola part that says "due viole" suggesting possibly that 4 violins- 2 of each- 2 violas, 1 cello/bass (concertino) and 1 "ripieno" cello/bass (as it says on the relevant part) are implied, rather than divided larger sections. The 2 violin I parts and 2 violin II parts seem to differ only "typographically" in minor details (placement of dynamics, e.g.)? (speaking figuratively as they are all manuscript.)
Auteursrecht
1-5 /11
Manuscript, n.d.(ca.1780).
Uitgever
Manuscript, n.d.(ca.1780).
Overige opmerkingen
Mss.Ms. 20482-5 in Stabikat-Berlin. The parts bundle has 4 violin parts (2 for the violin I section and 2 for the violin II section) and a viola part that says "due viole" suggesting possibly that 4 violins- 2 of each- 2 violas, 1 cello/bass (concertino) and 1 "ripieno" cello/bass (as it says on the relevant part) are implied, rather than divided larger sections. The 2 violin I parts and 2 violin II parts seem to differ only "typographically" in minor details (placement of dynamics, e.g.)? (speaking figuratively as they are all manuscript.)
Auteursrecht