악보
파트보
Richault, n.d.(1850).
출판사
Paris: Richault, n.d.(1850). Plate 10341.R.
기타 참고 사항
Ok, this is a right mess...This file needs to be replaced because
The first violin part here belongs to a B-flat major/G minor quartet (presumably his 4th quartet), the other three parts to the same quartet as in the Opus 5 file (the quartet in F♯ minor.) I don't think Dancla was a Milhaud before the letter, intending for these string parts to be played together and at once, so someone needs to ask CWRU if there's a problem on their end that can be fixed....
The first violin part here belongs to a B-flat major/G minor quartet (presumably his 4th quartet), the other three parts to the same quartet as in the Opus 5 file (the quartet in F♯ minor.) I don't think Dancla was a Milhaud before the letter, intending for these string parts to be played together and at once, so someone needs to ask CWRU if there's a problem on their end that can be fixed....
Richault, n.d.(1850).
출판사
Paris: Richault, n.d.(1850). Plate 10341.R.
기타 참고 사항
Ok, this is a right mess...This file needs to be replaced because
The first violin part here belongs to a B-flat major/G minor quartet (presumably his 4th quartet), the other three parts to the same quartet as in the Opus 5 file (the quartet in F♯ minor.) I don't think Dancla was a Milhaud before the letter, intending for these string parts to be played together and at once, so someone needs to ask CWRU if there's a problem on their end that can be fixed....
The first violin part here belongs to a B-flat major/G minor quartet (presumably his 4th quartet), the other three parts to the same quartet as in the Opus 5 file (the quartet in F♯ minor.) I don't think Dancla was a Milhaud before the letter, intending for these string parts to be played together and at once, so someone needs to ask CWRU if there's a problem on their end that can be fixed....